Categories: Opinion

Where Does the Power Really Lie for Incarcerated Parents?

By Jesus Limon, Esteban Plata, Carolina Ramirez, Lizeth Sebastian, and Yi Zhang

With Welfare Code 365.1, incarcerated parents are given the opportunity to reunify with their children. They are given some power in regards to their relationships with their children, which could impact their lives once they are released from prison or jail. There exists still an imbalance of power because incarcerated parents are situated in a government institution. In our society, stigma is associated with incarceration and some may believe that a parent in prison cannot be a good parent and should not be able to see their children (Sherry, 2010). In some cases, incarcerated parents who committed violent crimes are not eligible to receive reunification services from the child welfare system (Downing, 2012).

In other cases, children are still given a chance to maintain a relationship with their parent only if it is in their best interest (Sherry, 2010). Social workers and the court system have more power because they determine if reunification services will be allowed or will be detrimental to the child. However, social workers are kept accountable for providing services to the incarcerated parents (Downing, 2012).

There is also a distribution of power to other professionals providing services to the parents, such as attorneys, therapists, prison officials, and social workers in partnering agencies (Downing, 2012). The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) has a part because they create the rules for the prison systems. Incarcerated parents may not be able to participate in services being offered if the rules of the prison system interfere or do not assist in facilitating the process (Serrato, 2016). As mentioned previously, the prison system in general does not provide a good environment for a parent who is trying to maintain a relationship with their child. An imbalance of power persists, even among the different governing departments. The criminal justice system makes various policies based on their focus of punishment and sentencing for crimes, while the child welfare system creates their policies based on safety and permanency for children (Serrato, 2016). The incarcerated parent holds less power than any of these two systems.

 

 References

Downing, H. D. (2012). Barriers to reunification for incarcerated parents – a judicial perspective.

Family Court Review, 50(1), 71-76. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01429.x.

 

Serrato, C. (2016). How reasonable are reasonable efforts for the children of incarcerated

parents? Golden Gate University Law Review, 46(2), 177-197.

 

Sherry, S. (2010). When jail fails: amending the ASFA to reduce its negative impact on children of incarcerated parents. Family Court Review, 48(2), 380-397. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01316.x.

Staff

Recent Posts

Policy Chat with Bindu! 7/18 Recap

This session focused on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which became law on July…

7 days ago

Policy Chat with Bindu!

Welcome to your one-stop space for staying connected to NASW-CA’s advocacy work.Each month, Policy Chat…

2 weeks ago

2025-2026 Region E Updates

Welcome to Region E – San Diego, where we are proud to serve one of…

2 weeks ago

Rooted Together Resources

This page is a living collection of resources shared during our weekly support groups held…

3 weeks ago

2025 Lobby Day – Day 1

Legislative Learning Day | April 27, 2025Our Lobby Days kicked off with a powerful day…

3 months ago

2025 LOBBY DAY – DAY 2

Lobby Day Rally | April 28, 2025On April 28, social workers, students, and advocates united…

3 months ago